Core i3-6100T vs i3-3110M
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 33.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 33.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2015
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
33.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
6.03k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
6.6k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
2.31k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.08k (x0.68)
TOTAL
34.79k
17.03k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-6100T
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
12.52k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
13.71k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.16k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.43k (x0.95)
TOTAL
79.1k
33.81k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
392 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
147 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
69 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
966 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
2748 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
964 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
868 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
7095 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4