| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i3-10100T


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.2 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
4.32k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
15.7k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
5.04k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
7.68k (x3.48)
TOTAL
21.55k
32.73k (x1.52)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
16.59k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
71.1k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
23.26k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
3.86k (x1.39)
TOTAL
50.49k
114.81k (x2.27)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
13.88k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
20.94k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
5.18k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.2k (x2.68)
TOTAL
34.79k
48.19k (x1.39)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
54.88k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
93.17k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
23.34k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
3.85k (x1.5)
TOTAL
79.1k
175.24k (x2.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
24.31k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
22.15k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
5.14k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
8.46k (x2.44)
TOTAL
43.92k
60.06k (x1.37)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
101.48k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
98.04k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
24.28k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.86k (x1)
TOTAL
105.21k
227.67k (x2.16)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4