| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs M-5Y10c


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.6 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-S
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2015
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
51k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
7.22k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
9.98k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
2.75k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.98k (x0.97)
TOTAL
34.79k
22.93k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-6100T

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
15.07k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
24.8k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.68k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
4.46k (x1.74)
TOTAL
79.1k
51k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4