Core i3-6100T vs Celeron N3450
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the N3450 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the N3450 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
506c9
Core
Skylake-S
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
November 2015
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
39.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.54k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
2.86k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
1.88k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
1.78k (x0.81)
TOTAL
21.55k
8.06k (x0.37)
Multithread
i3-6100T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
5.91k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
8.55k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
5.48k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
2.98k (x1.08)
TOTAL
50.49k
22.92k (x0.45)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
985 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
914 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
497 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
3820 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
701 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
811 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
3662 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4