Core i3-6100T vs Celeron N3150
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the N3150 gets 18 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the N3150 gets 18 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
406c3
Core
Skylake-S
Braswell
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
November 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
31.8k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.07k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
1.74k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
1.5k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
1.46k (x0.66)
TOTAL
21.55k
5.78k (x0.27)
Multithread
i3-6100T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
3.99k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
6.31k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
5.05k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
2.65k (x0.96)
TOTAL
50.49k
18k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
664 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
1052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
442 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
3000 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
836 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
702 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
2777 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4