| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.9 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
3.8k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
17.38k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
5.17k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
3.16k (x1.43)
TOTAL
21.55k
29.52k (x1.37)

Multithread

i3-6100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
15.28k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
76.44k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
27.48k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
3.02k (x1.09)
TOTAL
50.49k
122.2k (x2.42)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
13.04k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
22.35k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
5.37k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.4k (x1.11)
TOTAL
34.79k
44.15k (x1.27)

Multithread

i3-6100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
56.49k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
100.74k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
28.21k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
3.04k (x1.18)
TOTAL
79.1k
188.49k (x2.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
14.2k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
23.23k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
5.35k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
5.18k (x1.49)
TOTAL
43.92k
47.96k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-6100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
58.24k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
105.72k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
28.73k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.59k (x1.45)
TOTAL
105.21k
198.27k (x1.88)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4