| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
100fa0
Core
Skylake-S
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.98k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
4.57k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.57k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
3.51k (x1.59)
TOTAL
21.55k
12.64k (x0.59)

Multithread

i3-6100T

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
11.86k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
27.4k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
15.39k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
3.46k (x1.25)
TOTAL
50.49k
58.11k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
612 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4