Core i3-6100T vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
660f51
Core
Skylake-S
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
950
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
12.44k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
15.96k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
3.54k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
3k (x0.86)
TOTAL
43.92k
34.93k (x0.8)
Multithread
i3-6100T
950
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
40.75k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
42.07k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
12.53k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.45k (x1.15)
TOTAL
105.21k
99.8k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
950
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4