| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs A6 9220e


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 3.6 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
670f00
Core
Skylake-S
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2015
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
29.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
7.84k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
10.54k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
2.27k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
1.7k (x0.49)
TOTAL
43.92k
22.34k (x0.51)

Multithread

i3-6100T

9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
11.42k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
12.58k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.62k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
1.77k (x0.46)
TOTAL
105.21k
29.39k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
4898 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4