| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
806c1
Core
Skylake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
3.75k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
17.22k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
9.79k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
8.21k (x3.72)
TOTAL
21.55k
38.97k (x1.81)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
9.19k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
35.47k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
19.14k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
5.82k (x2.1)
TOTAL
50.49k
69.62k (x1.38)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
14.65k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
21.57k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
9.93k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
8.02k (x2.62)
TOTAL
34.79k
54.18k (x1.56)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
32.14k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
43.54k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
19.58k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
5.61k (x2.19)
TOTAL
79.1k
100.87k (x1.28)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
24.25k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
21.63k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
9.09k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
7.23k (x2.09)
TOTAL
43.92k
62.19k (x1.42)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
56.9k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
55.68k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
19.29k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.09k (x1.58)
TOTAL
105.21k
137.96k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4