| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs Xeon E5645


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 91.1 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
206c2
Core
Skylake-S
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
51 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
76.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.81k
1.78k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
3.91k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
2.52k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
2.42k (x0.57)
TOTAL
28.89k
10.64k (x0.37)

Multithread

i3-6100

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
7.75k
9.67k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
37.33k
22.92k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.13k
14.31k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.81k (x1.07)
TOTAL
60.77k
50.7k (x0.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
6.47k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
4.4k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.44k
2.43k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
2.33k (x0.53)
TOTAL
43.55k
15.64k (x0.36)

Multithread

i3-6100

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
28.99k
34.43k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
45.75k
24.23k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.72k
14.48k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
3.81k (x1.04)
TOTAL
91.14k
76.96k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i3-6100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
568 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
897 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1787 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5393 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1469 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
11770 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4