| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs i5-9300H


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.7 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
906ed
Core
Skylake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
51 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
61.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
187.98k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
24.7k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
21.5k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.87k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
9.99k (x2.49)
TOTAL
52.84k
61.06k (x1.16)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
85.56k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
76.43k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
19.35k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
6.63k (x1.78)
TOTAL
112.28k
187.98k (x1.67)

Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
430 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
4177 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6023 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2437 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
14893 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4