Core i3-6100 vs i5-8265U
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
806eb
Core
Skylake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
24.32k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
20.35k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.38k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
8.52k (x2.12)
TOTAL
52.84k
57.57k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-6100
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
65.17k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
63.6k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
14.4k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
6.31k (x1.7)
TOTAL
112.28k
149.48k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4