Core i3-6100 vs i5-7400T
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-7400T gets 163.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
906e9
Core
Skylake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
51 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
49.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
163.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
19.7k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
17.29k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.07k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
8.1k (x2.02)
TOTAL
52.84k
49.16k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-6100
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
75.27k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
66.24k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
13.93k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
7.95k (x2.14)
TOTAL
112.28k
163.4k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
2151 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
1893 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
398 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
4669 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-7400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5764 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2700 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
16388 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4