| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs i5-2450M


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2450M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the i5-2450M gets 43.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-2450M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
51 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2012
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
22.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
43.44k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-2450M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.78k
8.39k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
7.65k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.64k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.17k (x0.85)
TOTAL
43.92k
22.85k (x0.52)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-2450M
Test#1 (Integers)
29.02k
17.96k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
49.55k
14.71k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.3k
7.51k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.26k (x1)
TOTAL
94.15k
43.44k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-2450M
Test#1 (Integers)
569 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
972 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
241 points/W
215 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
1846 points/W
1241 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-2450M
Test#1 (Integers)
3723 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
2468 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
1174 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1009 points/GHz
1022 points/GHz
TOTAL
11871 points/GHz
7370 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4