| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.81k
4.05k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
15.29k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.04k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
10.54k (x2.46)
TOTAL
28.89k
38.92k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.75k
9.05k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
37.33k
33.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.13k
15.34k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
6.74k (x1.89)
TOTAL
60.77k
65.01k (x1.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
7.07k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
10.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.44k
5.27k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
5.66k (x1.29)
TOTAL
43.55k
28.56k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
28.99k
25.28k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
45.75k
37.48k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.72k
17.77k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
6.92k (x1.88)
TOTAL
91.14k
87.45k (x0.96)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.78k
13.9k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
20.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
9.41k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
10.59k (x2.84)
TOTAL
43.92k
54.03k (x1.23)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.02k
55.4k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
49.55k
59.01k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.3k
22.83k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
6.7k (x2.04)
TOTAL
94.15k
143.94k (x1.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
25.53k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
19.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
9.31k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
10.81k (x2.7)
TOTAL
52.84k
65.64k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-6100

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
58.46k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
57.31k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
20.1k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
6.81k (x1.83)
TOTAL
112.28k
142.69k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4