Core i3-6100 vs i5-10210U
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
806ec
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
22.96k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
20.8k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.76k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
7.5k (x1.87)
TOTAL
52.84k
56.03k (x1.06)
Multithread
i3-6100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
66.43k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
62.38k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
14.52k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
4.45k (x1.2)
TOTAL
112.28k
147.78k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4