| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the 5700G gets 467.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 4.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
84.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
467.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
23.02k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
25.22k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
11.56k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
24.6k (x6.14)
TOTAL
52.84k
84.4k (x1.6)

Multithread

i3-6100

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
152.53k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
208.8k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
95.22k (x8.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
11.15k (x3)
TOTAL
112.28k
467.69k (x4.17)

Performance/W
i3-6100
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
2347 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
3212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
1465 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
7195 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5483 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
5348 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
18348 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4