Core i3-6100 vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
13.75k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
22.58k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.99k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
3.55k (x0.88)
TOTAL
52.84k
44.87k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-6100
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
50.99k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
84.4k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
18.95k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
3.2k (x0.86)
TOTAL
112.28k
157.54k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i3-6100
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4