Core i3-6100 vs FX 8350
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
600f20
Core
Skylake-S
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
51 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
13.78k
9.85k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
8.41k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.58k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
6.32k (x1.69)
TOTAL
43.92k
28.16k (x0.64)
Multithread
i3-6100
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
29.02k
44.93k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
49.55k
45.21k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.3k
22.81k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
5.19k (x1.58)
TOTAL
94.15k
118.14k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i3-6100
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
569 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
972 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
241 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
1846 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3723 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1009 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
11871 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4