Core i3-6006U vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
106a5
Core
Skylake-U
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
7.35k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
4.89k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.9k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
2.82k (x0.98)
TOTAL
23.48k
17.96k (x0.76)
Multithread
i3-6006U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
29.69k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
22.26k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
14.91k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
6.29k (x2.58)
TOTAL
47.46k
73.16k (x1.54)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4