| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs Pentium N5000


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
706a1
Core
Skylake-U
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2016
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
54.76k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
5.12k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
7.66k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.79k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
1.7k (x0.59)
TOTAL
23.48k
17.27k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-6006U

N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
17.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
25.71k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
9.45k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.05k (x0.84)
TOTAL
47.46k
54.76k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
9127 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4