Core i3-6006U vs m3-7Y30
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
806e9
Core
Skylake-U
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2016
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
10.02k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
9.22k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
2.04k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
4.31k (x1.17)
TOTAL
30.66k
25.6k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-6006U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
21.75k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
20.51k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
4.97k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
5.56k (x1.37)
TOTAL
67.91k
52.78k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4