| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-6200U


Description
Both models i3-6006U and i5-6200U are based on Skylake architecture.

Sky Lake is also known as 6th generation Core. Include Thunderbolt 3.0, SATA Express and Iris Pro graphics with DirectX 12. It uses LGA 1151 socket for mainstream models and LGA 2066 for X-Series. Sky Lake comes with AVX2 support in all mainstreams CPUs and AVX-512 in some high end models.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6200U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
406e3
Core
Skylake-U
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
81.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
17.06k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
15.24k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
3.35k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
3.22k (x0.81)
TOTAL
31.3k
38.87k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
35.68k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
33.68k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
7.74k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
4.09k (x1.09)
TOTAL
68.38k
81.18k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
5412 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4