| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-2400


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
84.36k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
2.72k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
7.6k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
3.98k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
4.47k (x1.14)
TOTAL
16.77k
18.78k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
10.37k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
28.84k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
15.08k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
4.67k (x1.29)
TOTAL
30.39k
58.95k (x1.94)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
9.16k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
8.2k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
3.95k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
4.17k (x1.36)
TOTAL
24.53k
25.49k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
34.74k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
31.07k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
14.86k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
3.69k (x1.43)
TOTAL
49.87k
84.36k (x1.69)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
1022 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1707 points/W
327 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
888 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3670 points/GHz
2695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5683 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1540 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
TOTAL
12265 points/GHz
7497 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4