| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-10500T


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 4.4 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
3.87k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
15.79k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
5.1k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
12.13k (x3.09)
TOTAL
16.77k
36.89k (x2.2)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
22.17k (x5.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
101.79k (x5.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
34.13k (x5.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
3.74k (x1.03)
TOTAL
30.39k
161.83k (x5.33)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
13.94k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
20.01k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.34k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
11.41k (x3.96)
TOTAL
23.48k
50.7k (x2.16)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
82.18k (x5.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
124.23k (x5.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
35.6k (x5.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
3.73k (x1.53)
TOTAL
47.46k
245.75k (x5.18)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
14.01k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
21.17k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
5.21k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
11.42k (x3.71)
TOTAL
24.53k
51.82k (x2.11)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
82.38k (x5.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
115.64k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
32.22k (x5.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
3.71k (x1.43)
TOTAL
49.87k
233.94k (x4.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
25.16k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
22.28k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
5.18k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
11.97k (x3.03)
TOTAL
31.3k
64.6k (x2.06)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
144.86k (x4.84)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
120.98k (x4.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
32.55k (x4.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.73k (x0.99)
TOTAL
68.38k
302.13k (x4.42)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4