Core i3-6006U vs i3-2100
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i3-2100 gets 40.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i3-2100 gets 40.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
19.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
40.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
7.07k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
7.16k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.62k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
2.67k (x0.87)
TOTAL
24.53k
19.52k (x0.8)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
14.19k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
15.19k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
7.26k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
3.46k (x1.34)
TOTAL
49.87k
40.1k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
1022 points/W
218 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1707 points/W
234 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
112 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
617 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
3670 points/GHz
2279 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5683 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1540 points/GHz
862 points/GHz
TOTAL
12265 points/GHz
6297 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4