| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs Celeron N5095


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
906c0
Core
Skylake-U
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2016
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
10.08k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
10.11k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.06k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
2.36k (x0.82)
TOTAL
23.48k
26.6k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-6006U

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
36.86k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
38.51k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
15.17k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.72k (x1.12)
TOTAL
47.46k
93.26k (x1.96)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4