| | | |

Core i3-6006U vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2016
December 2012

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2019
2343 (16.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
8202
6537 (-20.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2631
3002 (14.10%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3923
2738 (-30.19%)
TOTAL
16774
14620 (-12.84%)

Multithread

i3-6006U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3826
4666 (21.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
17170
12658 (-26.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5775
5950 (3.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3619
2526 (-30.21%)
TOTAL
30389
25799 (-15.10%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7279
7873 (8.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
10510
7135 (-32.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808
3043 (8.39%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2882
2786 (-3.31%)
TOTAL
23479
20837 (-11.25%)

Multithread

i3-6006U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
14976
15118 (0.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
23682
14052 (-40.66%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6371
5938 (-6.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2435
3481 (42.97%)
TOTAL
47464
38589 (-18.70%)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8