| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
11.13k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
19.38k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
4.47k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
3.87k (x0.98)
TOTAL
31.3k
38.85k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-6006U

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
17.13k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
30.56k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
9.44k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
4.09k (x1.09)
TOTAL
68.38k
61.23k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4