Core i3-6006U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
3.89k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
17.94k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
5.34k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
6.62k (x1.69)
TOTAL
16.77k
33.79k (x2.01)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
15.07k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
66.84k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
19.56k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
6.54k (x1.81)
TOTAL
30.39k
108.01k (x3.55)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
14.3k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
21.69k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.42k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
6.6k (x2.29)
TOTAL
23.48k
48k (x2.04)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
55.45k (x3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
83.13k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
20.76k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
6.58k (x2.7)
TOTAL
47.46k
165.91k (x3.5)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
13.05k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
22.88k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
5.39k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
7.31k (x2.37)
TOTAL
24.53k
48.63k (x1.98)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
51.73k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
87.74k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
20.74k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
6.57k (x2.54)
TOTAL
49.87k
166.79k (x3.34)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
14.48k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
23.84k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
5.43k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
5.46k (x1.48)
TOTAL
30.66k
49.21k (x1.6)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
54.39k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
88.77k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
20.04k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
5.48k (x1.35)
TOTAL
67.91k
168.69k (x2.48)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4