| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1200 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
800f11
Core
Skylake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2016
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
11.73k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
18.85k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
4.22k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
2.76k (x0.7)
TOTAL
31.3k
37.55k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-6006U

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
38.56k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
62.21k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
13.7k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.33k (x0.89)
TOTAL
68.38k
117.81k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4