| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs A6 9220e


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 2.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
670f00
Core
Skylake-U
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2016
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
29.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
7.84k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
10.54k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.27k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
1.7k (x0.43)
TOTAL
31.3k
22.34k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-6006U

9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
11.42k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
12.58k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
3.62k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
1.77k (x0.47)
TOTAL
68.38k
29.39k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
4898 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4