Core i3-6006U vs i7-11700F
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 7.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 7.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
a0671
Core
Skylake-U
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
32.55k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
26.95k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
10.76k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
19.32k (x4.89)
TOTAL
31.3k
89.58k (x2.86)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
232.06k (x7.75)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
203.56k (x7.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
72.89k (x10.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
3.81k (x1.01)
TOTAL
68.38k
512.32k (x7.49)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4