| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-11300H


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 68.4 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 4.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
806c1
Core
Skylake-U
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.3k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.38k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
25.83k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
11.72k
23.56k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
9.2k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
5.06k (x1.28)
TOTAL
31.3k
63.64k (x2.03)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.95k
116.87k (x3.9)
Test#2 (FP)
27.93k
121.08k (x4.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.74k
41.8k (x6.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.77k
6k (x1.59)
TOTAL
68.38k
285.75k (x4.18)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1997 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1862 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
449 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
251 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4559 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6444 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5858 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1371 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1975 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
15649 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4