| | | | | | |

Core i3-5005U vs i5-3340M


Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 1.3 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
306a9
Core
Broadwell-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
62.75k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
11.51k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
11.13k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
4.4k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
4.55k (x1.89)
TOTAL
19.84k
31.58k (x1.59)

Multithread

i3-5005U

i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
22.59k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
25.49k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
10.42k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
4.25k (x1.33)
TOTAL
47.89k
62.75k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i3-5005U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3193 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3118 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4411 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1201 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
9920 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4