| | | | | | |

Core i3-5005U vs i5-2410M


Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-5005U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
206a7
Core
Broadwell-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
38.68k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
7.38k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
6.76k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
3.3k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
2.66k (x1.11)
TOTAL
19.84k
20.1k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-5005U

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
14.17k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
14.71k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
6.93k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
2.87k (x0.9)
TOTAL
47.89k
38.68k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i3-5005U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
198 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3193 points/W
1105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
3118 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4411 points/GHz
2332 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1201 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
TOTAL
9920 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4