| | | | | | |

Core i3-5005U vs i5-10400T


Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.6 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
a0653
Core
Broadwell-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
307.18k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
12.5k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
19.05k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
4.72k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
10.3k (x4.29)
TOTAL
19.84k
46.57k (x2.35)

Multithread

i3-5005U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
74.58k (x6.05)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
126.96k (x4.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
31.76k (x4.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
2.5k (x0.78)
TOTAL
47.89k
235.8k (x4.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-5005U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
22k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
19.98k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.51k
4.57k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
11.31k (x4.49)
TOTAL
25.61k
57.85k (x2.26)

Multithread

i3-5005U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
136.69k (x5.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.79k
135.25k (x5.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
32.76k (x5.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.48k (x0.82)
TOTAL
54.99k
307.18k (x5.59)

Performance/W
i3-5005U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1541 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1519 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5541 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4749 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12804 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4