Core i3-5005U vs i3-3240
Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306a9
Core
Broadwell-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
15 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
24.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
49.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
8.46k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
10.69k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
3.09k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
2.23k (x0.93)
TOTAL
19.84k
24.48k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-5005U
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
17.92k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
21.21k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
7.77k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
2.8k (x0.88)
TOTAL
47.89k
49.7k (x1.04)
Performance/W
i3-5005U
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
326 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3193 points/W
904 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
3118 points/GHz
2490 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4411 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1201 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
9920 points/GHz
7200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4