| | | | | | |

Core i3-5005U vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f81
Core
Broadwell-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-5005U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
11.13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
19.38k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.51k
4.47k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.87k (x1.54)
TOTAL
25.61k
38.85k (x1.52)

Multithread

i3-5005U

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
17.13k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.79k
30.56k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
9.44k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.09k (x1.35)
TOTAL
54.99k
61.23k (x1.11)

Performance/W
i3-5005U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1541 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1519 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5541 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4749 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
12804 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4