Core i3-5005U vs FX 9590
Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.9 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 47.9 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.9 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
600f20
Core
Broadwell-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/8
TDP
15 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
11.51k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
9.57k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
4.19k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
7.14k (x2.97)
TOTAL
19.84k
32.41k (x1.63)
Multithread
i3-5005U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
55.13k (x4.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
51.69k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
27.02k (x4.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.81k (x1.2)
TOTAL
47.89k
137.65k (x2.87)
Performance/W
i3-5005U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
3193 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3118 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4411 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1201 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
9920 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4