| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 66.7 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.4 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
1067a
Core
Haswell
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12288 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
48.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
2.6k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
6.67k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
2.72k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
4.43k (x1.06)
TOTAL
23.88k
16.42k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-4170

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
9.92k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
25.37k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
10.31k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
3.37k (x1.26)
TOTAL
49k
48.96k (x1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4170
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
3.28k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
7.28k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
2.83k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
3.9k (x0.93)
TOTAL
34.04k
17.29k (x0.51)

Multithread

i3-4170

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
11.72k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
24.91k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
9.77k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
2.57k (x0.66)
TOTAL
66.65k
48.98k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i3-4170
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
478 points/W
123 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
262 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1234 points/W
516 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3157 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1132 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
TOTAL
9199 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4