Core i3-4170 vs i5-6200U
Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-6200U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
81.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
17.06k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
15.24k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
3.35k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.22k (x0.73)
TOTAL
44.24k
38.87k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-4170
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
35.68k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
33.68k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
7.74k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
4.09k (x1.52)
TOTAL
92.71k
81.18k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-4170
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
5412 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4170
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4