| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs i5-3330


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 72.7 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306a9
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
104.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
13.24k
10.85k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.37k
10.47k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
4.21k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
4.31k (x1.03)
TOTAL
34.89k
29.84k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
28.15k
41.77k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
29.95k
40.2k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.84k
16.11k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.73k
6.7k (x2.45)
TOTAL
72.68k
104.78k (x1.44)

Performance/W
i3-4170
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
521 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
555 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
1346 points/W
1361 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3579 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3343 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
9430 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4