| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 9 5900X


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 9.1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a20f10
Core
Haswell
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
54 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
840.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
24.34k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
26.8k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
12.12k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
26.55k (x6.03)
TOTAL
44.24k
89.82k (x2.03)

Multithread

i3-4170

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
263.12k (x5.6)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
353.9k (x11.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
159.07k (x13.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
64.01k (x23.85)
TOTAL
92.71k
840.11k (x9.06)

Performance/W
i3-4170
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
8001 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4