| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 4.6 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a50f00
Core
Haswell
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
4.31k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
17.51k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
10.53k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
23.57k (x5.61)
TOTAL
23.88k
55.92k (x2.34)

Multithread

i3-4170

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
24.18k (x3.14)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
117.98k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
70.96k (x6.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
8.08k (x3.01)
TOTAL
49k
221.19k (x4.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
20.37k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
22.52k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
10.18k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
21.49k (x4.88)
TOTAL
44.24k
74.56k (x1.69)

Multithread

i3-4170

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
144.01k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
191.86k (x6.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
84.53k (x7.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
6.5k (x2.42)
TOTAL
92.71k
426.9k (x4.6)

Performance/W
i3-4170
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4