| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 2.9 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
13.67k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
22.28k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
4.99k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
15.22k (x3.46)
TOTAL
44.24k
56.16k (x1.27)

Multithread

i3-4170

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
81.03k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
145.84k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
39.14k (x3.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
6.79k (x2.53)
TOTAL
92.71k
272.8k (x2.94)

Performance/W
i3-4170
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4