Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
2.63k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
7.84k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
3.63k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
2.93k (x0.7)
TOTAL
23.88k
17.02k (x0.71)
Multithread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
5.77k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
24.15k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
9.28k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
2.83k (x1.06)
TOTAL
49k
42.02k (x0.86)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
11.67k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
14.02k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.53k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
2.93k (x0.7)
TOTAL
34.04k
33.14k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
20.49k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
31.32k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
9.99k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.03k (x0.78)
TOTAL
66.65k
64.82k (x0.97)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.24k
11.54k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
12.37k
19.69k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
4.55k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
34.89k
39.03k (x1.12)
Multithread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.15k
19.25k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
29.95k
36.27k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.84k
10.2k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.73k
3.07k (x1.12)
TOTAL
72.68k
68.8k (x0.95)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
10.73k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
18.15k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
3.99k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.89k (x0.88)
TOTAL
44.24k
36.77k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
20.11k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
36.87k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
10.74k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
3.31k (x1.23)
TOTAL
92.71k
71.02k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4170
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4