Core i3-4170 vs A10 5745M
Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5745M is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 72.7 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 2 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 72.7 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 2 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
610f31
Core
Haswell
Richland
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket FP2
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
17.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
37.11k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4170
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.24k
6.66k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
12.37k
5.63k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
2.4k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
2.39k (x0.57)
TOTAL
34.89k
17.08k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-4170
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
28.15k
13.55k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
29.95k
13.9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.84k
6.75k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.73k
2.91k (x1.06)
TOTAL
72.68k
37.11k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i3-4170
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
521 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
555 points/W
556 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1346 points/W
1484 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4170
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
3579 points/GHz
2297 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3343 points/GHz
1941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1381 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
9430 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4