| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs i5-11300H


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 3.1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806c1
Core
Haswell
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
25.83k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
23.56k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
9.2k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
5.06k (x1.15)
TOTAL
44.24k
63.64k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
116.87k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
121.08k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
41.8k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
6k (x2.24)
TOTAL
92.71k
285.75k (x3.08)

Performance/W
i3-4170
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4